USE OF GnRH AGONISTS
IN THE ACUTE PORPHYRIAS
INDICATIONS
Occasional patients
with porphyria, particularly those
with acute intermittent porphyria
(AIP), experience regular cyclical
attacks apparently precipitated
by the menstrual cycle. Typically,
such attacks arise shortly before
a period starts and may occur at
monthly intervals. Suppression of
the menstrual cycle with gonadotrophin-releasing
hormone (GnRH) agonists is effective
in some, though not all, such patients.
In general, the more predictable
and classical the relationship between
the attacks and the cycle, the greater
the chance of success with this
therapy.
DISADVANTAGES
Women on GnRH agonist
therapy become functionally menopausal.
They develop typical symptoms of
oestrogen deficiency such as hot
flushes. Of more concern is the
development of accelerated osteoporosis
with a rapid loss in bone mass.
For this reason, we do not recommend
that this treatment be embarked
on lightly. Patient and doctor must
decide whether these disadvantages
are outweighed by the frequency
and severity of the porphyric attacks.
AGENTS TO USE
Various formulations
of GnRH agonist exist. The easiest
for the patient to use are depot
preparations of goserelin or buserelin
which are given by monthly intramuscular
injection. Similar agents may be
given by daily subcutaneous injection
by the patient herself or are available
as a nasal snuff.
METHOD OF USE
The most widely
used agents have partial agonist
activity and initiation of therapy
may theoretically induce a hormone
surge and even a porphyric attack.
This is minimised by starting treatment
within the first 10 days after the
last menstrual period. Thereafter
use is straight forward. The patient
on adequate doses will become amenorrhoeic.
Therapy also constitutes an effective
contraceptive. It must be stressed
however, that with the daily preparations,
the effect is short-lived and skipping
even one or two days may result
in cycling, a period, a porphyric
attack and even pregnancy.
DURATION OF TREATMENT
Theoretically,
the use of GnRH agonists for hormonal
suppression should not suppress
the porphyria per se as it does
nothing for the underlying enzyme
defect. Thus, patients are protected
against the acute attack only for
the period that they remain on therapy.
There does appear to be little point
in using this treatment for less
than 18 or 24 months. Experience
in one case has suggested to us
that following 24 months therapy,
the patient's susceptibility to
attacks had indeed lessened which
might reflect some "down regulation"
of the patient's requirement for
haem over the intervening period.
DEALING WITH OESTROGEN DEFICIENCY
Patients should
have osteodensitometry performed
at six monthly intervals to follow
the decline in bone mass. Experience
in one case showed us that we were
able to arrest this decline (and
even reverse it slightly) by allowing
the patient to take low dose supplemental
oestrogen daily. We used a dose
of Premarin 0.3 mg daily. This alleviated
the menopausal symptoms and was
followed by an improvement in bone
density readings. It did not exacerbate
the porphyria. However, in the patient
with an intact uterus, unopposed
oestrogens are not favoured because
of the risk of endometrial hyperplasia
and possible neoplastic transformation.
Addition of a small dose of a gestagen
provoked an acute attack, suggesting
that oestrogen alone is safer. We
therefore recommend that:
- The patient be started on GnRH
agonist alone and the effect observed
beyond one month to ensure that
hormonal suppression has occurred.
- Low dose supplemental oestrogen
be started and the effects observed
for several weeks to ensure that
a porphyric attack does not arise.
- The patient remain on low dose
supplemental oestrogen thereafter
and be considered for endometrial
curettage at 6 monthly intervals
to "clear out" the uterus.
- Bone densities be measured
serially by osteodensitometry.
- Treatment be continued for
at least 18 months.
STOPPING THERAPY
This is usually
uneventful. The menstrual cycle
recovers quickly thereafter. An
immediate return of fertility may
also be expected. The patient will
require monitoring for the development
of subsequent acute attacks; if
so, consideration may have to be
given to the reintroduction of GnRH
agonist therapy for a further period.
Return
to top of page
|